Featured

What if They’re Mostly White: A Look at Superintendent Diversity in Sonoma County

Part 2 (the following builds on the data regarding teacher ethnicity in Sonoma County and how school and district leadership continues to be challenged by a lack of diversity)

In the summer of 2020, I read an update from Superintendent Socorro Shiels from Sonoma Valley USD. It was different from the usual superintendent letter because she mentioned James Baldwin right up front. She called for the school community to address systemic racism, asking that we put teeth in Baldwin’s quote:

Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced. 

Baldwin is a personal hero of mine, both as a writer/poet and as an observer of the Civil Rights movement in America. He is fascinating because he is sometimes neglected in the 21st century. Unlike Medgar Evers, Malcolm X, or Dr. King, he was not assassinated, not martyred. And so his sometimes blistering words of critique of the white establishment are occasionally buried in time. He was also not a joiner, preferring to observe, write and speak about injustice rather than direct protest. He did not join the NAACP, for example, and spent most of his life in France, away from the turmoil in America.

Shiels’s letter impressed and motivated me. As we prepared to start school in the fall of 2020, America was in the midst of the Black Lives Matter movement for racial justice. The deaths of Breonna Taylor in March and George Floyd in May among others had galvanized America. It just didn’t feel like we could start the school year without directly addressing the movement and the issues at stake. So I met with two other teachers of our freshman elective (Success 101). (The class is designed as a foundation for the 9th grader to pivot as she/he/they moves through the high school experience. Students explore themselves at 14 years of age, reflecting on who they are and what they imagine for their futures. We look at career paths, college options, motivation, community service, and much more.) We decided to start the year with James Baldwin and his thoughts on civil rights in America. We found clips of Baldwin on the Dick Cavett Show, in debate at Harvard, and in the brilliant Oscar winning film directed by Raoul Peck, I Am Not Your Negro. 

We were Zooming, of course, and the students were in gentle shock. Their 8th grade year had been cut off in person in March and here they were starting high school remotely. Still, their response to the Baldwin material was remarkable. His words stirred conversation and placed the BLM movement in a context that made sense for these students. 

Then, in November, Shiels resigned or was fired from Sonoma Valley. I am not privy to what happened or why she was let go. But there went a Latina superintendent.

In January of 2021, Superintendent Diann Kitamura of Santa Rosa City Schools made a bold proclamation. “SRCS will be ready to open March 1. Whether we can or not is dependent upon this virus,“ she said. ”I want to assure parents, teachers, and the community, we will be ready. We are going to continue the hard work to be ready March 1 and the moment this virus becomes under control, if that is even a way to put it, we’ll open school.”  But by mid-February, it was clear that March 1st was too optimistic. Getting everybody in line on general agreements to reopen, including the teachers’ union, proved a challenge. It wasn’t until April that a hybrid approach brought some kids back to the physical classroom in Santa Rosa.

During this time, in early February, Kitamura announced her retirement, effective the end of the school year. There is nothing linking her retirement to the difficulty in reopening schools. But one can imagine the frustration and difficulty that the 2020-2021 school year has brought to school leaders. As she said at the time of her retirement announcement, “It’s an impossible situation that superintendents have been placed in and it’s taking away from what I love to do, which is teaching and educating,” she said. “We have been placed in situations to make medical decisions … and it’s just not fair.” And so in June, Kitamura will step away from the Santa Rosa superintendency.

So where do we stand now? There are 40 school districts in Sonoma County with 38 superintendents. (Two are joint districts separating elementary from secondary – Petaluma and Santa Rosa – that have one superintendent for both). Of these 38 superintendents at the start of the 2020-21 year, only four were non-white, to the best of my knowledge. Shiels is already out and Kitamura will leave in June, leaving only two: Dr. Mayra Perez (Cotati-Rohnert Park) and Dr. Sonjia Lowery (Old Adobe Union). 

Perez and Lowery are both first year superintendents, challenged as have all school leaders by Covid, Distance Learning and by the unique hurdles presented by the 2020-21 school year. I interviewed both Perez and Lowery to dig a little deeper into the question of ethnicity and school leadership, asking general questions about their onboarding, Covid implications, and their perceptions of race and educational leadership in Sonoma County. 

Dr. Perez at Cotati-Rohnert Park previously worked at the San Rafael Schools district office as a deputy superintendent. She has risen to the challenge of the year of Covid but admits it has been “one of the most difficult years in my career.” 

“I’m here to focus on student achievement, particularly with our most vulnerable students and instead, I’m doing crisis management,” she said. 

Dr. Lowery at Old Adobe Union in Petaluma most recently served as assistant superintendent for educational services at Elk Grove School District. Like Perez, she has endured the trial by fire of Covid, attempting the difficult dance of serving all students and staff while keeping everyone safe, happy and well paid. Lowery says she took the job in Petaluma partly to serve as a role model for others. “It is a big deal, being the first black superintendent in Petaluma. I actually turned down another job at a higher salary because I thought I should have this job because of all the little black girls in Oakland where I grew up.”

In her first year, she has tried to stay focused on her primary goal of equity. “I think I am carrying on with my normal warrior equity work, and trying to really encapsulate all that I’ve learned about leadership and social justice to apply to this context. We have to move from awareness to advocacy to action in this work. It’s a process but it is all about what we value and we believe.”

Both Perez and Lowery have dealt with interesting perceptions regarding their intent. In a year where safety due to Covid has taken center stage, equity work has been back-burnered to some extent. In early 2021, for instance, Lowery wrote an op-ed after the January 6th Capitol events. She found the community’s response fascinating: 

“The theme of the (op-ed) article was about how educators really have to lead the charge in talking to kids about what’s happening as history unfolds before our eyes. But what I got in response from parents and community members was, just focus on opening schools, stop sending us these op-ed pieces. Nobody was talking about this stuff when Black Lives Matter was protesting last year, and the underlying theme to those responses for me was be quiet, little black girl. Who are you to tell us?” 

Lowery has sensed that kind of response before. She described her reception in Petaluma as “duplicitous.” 

“On one hand,” she said,  “I have experienced a lot of warmth and on the other hand, there are nuances to how people are perceiving my leadership or decisions that are happening. I think a lot of those things are racially charged even though people don’t want to admit to that. But I know what I’m experiencing because I’ve experienced it my whole career in leadership.”

Perez has encountered similar challenges and experiences navigating a largely white leadership system in schools. “I code switch all the time. I can speak “white” very well and then when I’m at home, I’m Latina. That code switching is something you have to navigate. I’ve taught families who are flipping out about something (that has happened in school to their child) and I teach them how to navigate the system. This is what you do. You go here, you speak calmly, here is what you say. I think we have a system that’s built on whiteness, if the majority of the teachers and the majority of administrators are white, I need to learn how to reach them. My family was really good about teaching me how to be white.”

Both Perez and Lowery are interested in hiring excellent people who can change the white majority paradigm in Sonoma County. “It’s really interesting,” Perez said. “This (imbalance in staff) is quite typical and yet it was easier to recruit LatinX teachers in Southern California than Marin.” Perez points out that in some cases, we don’t have a lot of bilingual staff. When she started at the Cotati Rohnert Park district office, there was only bilingual staff member in the district office. “And then that person (a receptionist) took another job so it was me, the superintendent, doing the translating. So we’ve worked on that.”

Perez also spoke about hiring staff in general. “When you’re LatinX, you look for that (when hiring), and I don’t know if everyone thinks about that.” She points out that the job description needs to clearly identify need – bilingual, biliterate, etc. “In San Rafael, we started to do that – we were designing job descriptions. For me, if you say we’re looking for dual language teachers, that’s much more enticing than we want you to be Spanish.” She underlines the Importance of valuing bilingualism. “We need to create our own pipeline, we need to go into the high schools and encourage LatinX students, then (figure out) how to mentor them and coach them. …How do we build that pipeline?”

Like Perez, Lowery is looking for ways to add diversity through the hiring process. “I’ve explored this question in three other systems. Some of the solutions are, first, we need to leave that old adage that they (LatinX) are not applying at the door. We have to be intentional about recruitment. We have to go to the places where people of color are and recruit them.” For example, Lowery said, we need to hold hiring fairs in communities where people of color live and have the vision to bring them here to Petaluma.

Lowery also knows it is important to connect with other city and community leaders like the mayor, police chief, city manager and other civic leaders. “It’s important for them to see people of color in leadership positions. Joining city task forces. Try(ing) to tap into people of color in the community to become a part of a cohort of leaders who move this forward.”

Perez also senses that permanent change in hiring diversity is a hard thing to sustain. “When I was in San Gabriel (before working at San Rafael), I was part of the most diverse cabinet, the assistant superintendent was Latina, I was Latina, the executive assistant was Latina, and the superintendent was Asian. And that cabinet has been broken up. We’ve all moved on and they’ve replaced the team with primarily white men. You watch it and you say, Why was this team broken up? What is it? It’s possible we made people uncomfortable.”

That discomfort is precisely what leaders like Perez and Lowery bring to school systems here. They both recognize a business-as-usual, clubby kind of leadership that needs addressing. “At one point in San Rafael,” Perez said, “I had someone at a training say to me, I don’t want to talk about your race, I want to get to know you. And I said, well, you need to see me. You need to see my color because I identify that way. So I brought in race training. I was uncomfortable, so was the superintendent. I mean, everyone in the room was uncomfortable, and there were these awkward silences, but if we can’t have the conversation, we can’t move forward. “

Of course, Perez says, there are also gender issues to deal with in Sonoma County. “There is still the good ol’ boys club, not just here and in Marin quite frankly, but everywhere. There’s an author who says racism is like smog – you don’t see that you’re breathing it. Well, the gender stuff is prevalent here too. I’ve had men of color as well as white men really not want to have a brown boss. There is a banter connection. Gender has more of a role to play. As these women retire (Kitamura and others), who’s going to come in? It’s a different way of being.”

To be clear from my perspective, all school leaders face increasing challenges. I don’t personally know how well Perez or Lowery are performing in their leadership roles. Balancing Covid safety with learning expectations, salary negotiations, and Distance Learning would challenge any superintendent, and certainly first year superintendents. What is clear from their words is that the burden of proof in being a strong leader is heavier for them than for their white peers. 

NEXT STEPS:

Our collective next step is to ask these questions:

  1. How will Sonoma County districts address hiring in the short term i.e. replacing superintendent vacancies for 2021-22? 
  2. How does Sonoma County address the issue of teacher ethnicity? Is there more that can be done to encourage young LatinX students to consider teaching as a profession? Should school districts here do as Lowery suggests, go further afield to find LatinX leadership talent and bring them to Sonoma County rather than simply checking EdJoin (the hiring portal) to see who applied?
  3. Does local control of school districts inhibit a more general hiring process? Since each board of a school district is responsible for hiring the next superintendent, does this make it more difficult to hire diverse leaders? Should the Sonoma County Office of Education (and the county superintendent) play a larger role in encouraging school leader diversity? 
  4. Do we need to deepen the kind of training in implicit bias that many white school leaders carry as their own burden? I can recall examples in my own past practice as a school leader where decisions I made were based on out-dated perceptions. 
  5. Can we legitimately build the case that students of color are suffering their own burden of learning partially because current school leaders do not fully embrace and empathize with them? Where do we find the proof?

There are more questions than these and each answer leads to another set. But I’m confident that we can alter this paradigm with the right mixture of inquiry and pressure.

As we were signing off our interview, Dr. Perez told me a short story about her own teaching. It underlines the above discussion and reminds us that it is just not OK to let things be:

“When I was in the classroom as a student, it was about Dick, Jane and Spot, and they didn’t look anything like me. And I didn’t see me in my teachers either.” So when she had the chance, she said, she brought in writers like Reyna Grande (The Distance Between Us). “Students need to see role models, and if we don’t have the staff (yet), we need to bring role models into schools, hey listen, there are authors like Reyna. She says to them: I’m an author because I came to this country. If I had stayed in Mexico, I would have been working for someone, but now I have a voice.”

(A future post will break down leadership shifts for 2021-22 in Sonoma County – has anything changed?

National Data on Superintendents:

While the racial and ethnic diversity of districts in which superintendents work has increased in recent decades, new numbers from AASA, The School Superintendents Association, suggest the nation’s superintendents are still overwhelmingly white and male despite gradual shifts in demographics. 

The percentage of female superintendents increased slightly in the past decade, from 24.1% in 2010 to 26.68% in 2020 — more than double the percentage of female superintendents documented in 2000 (13.1%). 

The number of superintendents of color is increasing much more slowly, with 8.6% of respondents identifying as superintendents of color in 2020, compared to 6% in 2010 and 5% in 2000. Of the relatively small percentage who are African American, LatinX or other minority groups, nearly 42% are women. ​

Featured

The Loss of Equity When Teacher and Student Ethnicity Fall Out of Whack

The following is Part 1 of a two part examination of equity in terms of teacher, site administration, and district administration staff in Sonoma County. The central question is: does the race and gender of school staff affect student learning outcomes? If so, are we doing enough in Sonoma County to ensure that school staff generally match the student population being served. The first part looks at certificated teaching staff while Part 2 (coming May 26th) looks at district leadership.

     Last summer, I published some research on behalf of Kaiser Permanente on health care and schools. Kaiser commissioned the work partly because they wanted to gather more data on how schools and health care intersect. The Covid pandemic has underlined some of the conclusions of the study, including (sadly) that schools and healthcare tend to be quite separate. 

     But that isn’t what this post is about. One of the data points I looked at in that Kaiser report was race amongst Sonoma County educators relative to the students we serve. Staff at Kaiser had wondered whether schools in certain demographics did any better at preventive care, vaccinations, and general student health. Were there any factors, like the ethnicity of school staff, that could be variables in student health? I told the folks commissioning the study that making correlations like that would be a tall order, but it did send me to the data to check exactly who was teaching and who was leading education in Sonoma County.

     The data was alarming, as I point out below, but also deeply concerning because there is no obvious quick fix. We’ll return to that question at the end. During the last 20 years, the LatinX student population has increased significantly, from 18.9% to 45.6% of students, now a plurality of Sonoma County students. Though the number of teachers identifying as LatinX has increased in that span, less than 9% are LatinX, as of June 2019. It should be of huge concern that the number of LatinX teachers is so disproportionate to the student population (8% teachers to 45.6% students; 308 teachers to 31,799 students), a ratio of 1:96. Proportionately, white students (29288) are taught by white teachers (3362) in a 1:10 ratio. The data regarding administrators is similar during this twenty year time span. The number of administrators in general has grown from 334 to 405; the percentage of LatinX administrators has increased from 4% to 11%, accounting for most of the 8% drop in White administrators during this span. However, like certificated staff, 8 in 10 administrators are white.

Within these two datasets is one additional subset to focus on. Across the state of California in 2018-19, there were 6295 LatinX administrators (or 22.8%). But in Sonoma County, only 46 of 405 administrators were LatinX (or 11.4%). Sonoma County clearly lags the state in terms of LatinX teachers and administrators. 

The good news is that we know that the system can change because with regard to gender, it has! Over the last 20 years, administrative positions in Sonoma County have shifted to a much higher percentage of female administrators, from less than half (47.6%) in 1997-98 to more than 70% in 2018-19. This is a more profound shift than in the state (54.3% to 64%). In some ways, this makes logical sense in that a school often draws from its teaching ranks for administrators; it is reasonable, therefore, to see a trend where female administrators in 2018-19 (70.8% ) are now in proportion to female teaching staff in Sonoma County (76%). 

The bad news on rectifying the Latin X data is that the teachers in Sonoma are still predominantly white. And there is no immediate solution coming out of schools of education. In fact, when the Covid pandemic first struck back in March of 2020, one of the first actions by California’s Governor Newsom was to pull back on any discretionary spending. The thinking was probably that the economy would almost certainly go in the toilet and the forthcoming budget deficit would be a Goliath. One of the first cuts was the Teacher Residency Grant program. In general terms, the program is designed to support the development of California teachers in areas of shortage, like Special Education, STEM fields and bilingual education. The program has an intent to recruit and support non-white teachers, some of whom may struggle in choosing education as a career path. Becoming a teacher has a high cost of entry relative to the salary payoff down the road. After the expense of a four year college degree, the prospective teacher must complete a fifth year teaching credential program, including a stint in a classroom with a master teacher, first to observe and then gradually to take the reins of the class. 

This fifth year is expensive to the student in time and money. There are no earnings. But if one gets a Teacher Residency Grant, then, depending on the LEA (Local Educational Agency), the student teacher may earn up to $20,000 during that fifth year, critical bridge dollars to get her or him to the teaching credential. 

Newsom’s 2021 budget proposal includes a return of the program’s funding at higher levels than before. Specifically, his proposal would add an additional $100 million to expand the state’s teacher residency program. This would “enabl(e) teachers in training to spend a year working with mentor teachers in the classroom, and $25 million to expand a program that enables districts’ classified workers to earn a teaching credential.” (emphasis added)

So there is some hope, particularly if some LatinX classified staff embrace the opportunity to become teachers (since a much higher proportion of classified staff are LatinX.) But those in school of education know that developing teachers takes quite a while. First, significant recruitment must take place, perhaps in counties outside of Sonoma. But even then, prospective teachers are looking at 5 years of college + credential before entering the profession. And if the goal is to eventually have more LatinX site and district leaders, we may be more than a decade or more away. A typical administrator spends at least a few years teaching before seeking an administrative credential. 

Sonoma County is going to have to wrestle with this problem and perhaps do something more than simply wait for time to pass by. 


In Part 2, I look more directly at district leadership, an even more alarming disparity (coming May 26th)

A mid-February School Reopening Update: What if EVERYONE is Right?

School Reopening Update (Feb 19/2021)

Early this week, I went to get a haircut after months of shagginess. I went to a local place that had reopened two weeks before. There was no wait and I was soon in the chair, telling the haircutter (who I didn’t know) how much of the stuff on top I wanted gone. We soon settled into a typical conversation. She happened to have two children, 19 and 21 years of age, just like me. So we talked about how Covid had affected them and how they were doing now.

Then I told her I was a teacher. She wondered when schools would be getting back to normal and I wondered with her. We talked vaccines, indoor spaces, kids following rules, and how the state might eventually get this done. 

After a while, there was a lull, but I could sense there was something unsaid. “Do you think teachers should be going back sooner?” I asked. She stopped cutting for a moment and looked at me in the mirror. “Well, yeah, I mean, I’ve gone through this twice, coming back to work. It’s stressful worrying about (getting sick). But we’re here and we’re doing it.”

I’ve heard this in grocery stores, too. A cashier I know has worked throughout the Covid era. She has had to assume the risks of ignorant customers, indoor spaces and who knows who coming through her line. And there are many more like her, working in jobs of relative risk to exposure.

So why should teachers be different? Is it fair for teachers to hold out for both vaccinations before returning to school? So far in California, that has been the basic platform, though many schools are up and running in various hybrid models as I write. The general union position has been that school staff need both rounds of vaccination before return to school, a timeline that puts an early April restart in jeopardy. However, some schools are currently offering group “pod” instruction for students in high-risk groups like English Language Learners or special education. Others are running AM/PM programs where students are divided into cohorts and attend in person in a modified schedule. Some parents have selected remote instruction exclusively so schools must prepare systems to allow for both at one time. 

Across the country, there are thousands of schools that are in session. In many parts of Georgia, for example,  in-person instruction has been occurring since September. There have been school closures for periods of time during Covid upticks. In New York City, schools have been open for in-person and/or blended learning since December. School administrators there have struggled with matching rules for Covid testing with staff safety. Yesterday (2/18/21), the state of New York reversed itself on student Covid testing, saying that New York City public schools could once again require COVID-19 testing for in in-person classes.  

The plot graph below shows current building or classroom closures in NYC Public Schools. It is updated each day. Blue dots represent a classroom or classrooms within a building that have been closed; red dots represent an entire building closure. 

Clearly, there are still significant interruptions in instruction here due to Covid. Still, NYC Public Schools intends to bring back all “blended-learning” students in grades 6-8 for in person instruction by Thursday, February 25th.

In LA Unified, instruction has been remote since the start of the school year. In December, Governor Newsom proposed a return to in-person instruction by February 15th. At the time, he asked for $2 billion in state funds to facilitate getting kids back in school across the state, particularly in TK through second grade. His proposal prioritized districts with large numbers of low-income students, English learners, and/or foster youth or English learners. These populations have suffered the most in remote instruction, as Robin Lake, the director of the Center for Reinventing Public Education, describes: “Lower-income kids, kids of color, kids with unique needs like those who have a disability or other challenges – the numbers look very, very bad.” (source: NYTimes – 1/21/21)

But Newsom’s influence has waned significantly in the last two months. Like Ted Cruz’s decision to fly off to Cancun in the midst of the Texas Winter Crisis, Newsom’s November dinner at the exclusive French Laundry restaurant in Northern California continues to haunt him. A recall effort continues to gain momentum and Newsom is temporarily marginalized.

Yesterday (2/18/21), California legislators moved beyond Newsom’s proposal, agreeing to a $6.5 billion dollar package to bring students back to school. The bill (SB86) creates financial incentives to get California school districts to resume in-person classes by April 15th. $4 billion of the funding is specifically targeted for “in-person learning loss,” a critical feature. (Wherever you live in the country, this focus on lost learning will be critical – how these funds are spent by local school districts will be key, something this space will return to in coming months).

Though there is increasing evidence that transmission rates in schools is very low, teachers and school staff in some areas of the country may band together and hold on for both vaccination rounds. Because priority will go to K-3, I can see scenarios where some high schools don’t resume instruction until early May, if at all. In January, Superintendent of Santa Rosa City Schools in Northern California, Dr. Diann Kitamura, pledged that the district’s elementary students would be back in classrooms by March 1st. It was a gutsy call, but Covid circumstances haven’t been kind. On Wednesday (February 17th), Kitamura announced that the March 1st deadline would have to be moved back. The main sticking point appears to be negotiations with the Santa Rosa Teachers Association. A proposal by the union to ensure that staff had received both rounds of vaccination before returning may have been the difference. (Perhaps significantly, Kitamura has also announced her retirement at the end of the school year. She described her frustration with Covid and trying to steer education versus politics in the Covid era. “It’s an impossible situation that superintendents have been placed in and it’s taking away from what I love to do, which is teaching and educating. We have been placed in situations to make medical decisions…and it’s just not fair.” (source: Press Democrat, 2/17/21)

Evidence has increased that schools, particularly elementary schools, are unlikely to seed transmission when community spread is at moderate or low levels, provided they use mitigation strategies, including mask requirements, social distancing and good ventilation. Updated guidance from the Centers for Disease Control (2/12/21) includes the following statement from CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky:

FINALLY, I CANNOT ADDRESS SCHOOL REOPENINGS, AND OUR OPERATIONAL STRATEGY, WITHOUT TALKING ABOUT VACCINATIONS FOR TEACHERS AND STAFF. OUR OPERATIONAL STRATEGY, SPECIFICALLY, INCLUDES A COMPONENT ON VACCINATIONS FOR TEACHERS AND SCHOOL STAFF, AS AN ADDITIONAL LAYER OF PROTECTION THAT CAN BE ADDED TO THE RECOMMENDED FIVE KEY MITIGATION STRATEGIES. THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IMMUNIZATION PRACTICES, OR ACIP, RECOMMENDS THAT FRONTLINE-ESSENTIAL WORKERS, INCLUDING THOSE WHO WORK IN THE EDUCATION SECTOR, OUR TEACHERS, AND SCHOOL STAFF, ALONG WITH PEOPLE AGED GREATER THAN 75 BE PRIORITIZED FOR COVID-19 VACCINATION.

AS SUCH, WE STRONGLY ENCOURAGE STATES TO PRIORITIZE TEACHERS AND OTHER SCHOOL STAFF TO GET VACCINATED. IF WE WANT OUR CHILDREN TO RECEIVE IN-PERSON INSTRUCTION, WE MUST ENSURE THE TEACHERS AND SCHOOL STAFF ARE HEALTHY, AND PROTECTED FROM GETTING COVID-19 IN PLACES OUTSIDE OF SCHOOLS.

It’s sometimes true that EVERYONE is simultaneously right, from parents who are desperate to get their kids back in school to teachers who want to teach in person but who fear a potentially deadly disease to administrators and superintendents who can’t find a way to parse the divide. 

We will get back to in-person instruction, hopefully before the end of the school year. However, what has become increasingly clear is that teaching and learning during Covid has been significantly hampered. Far more low-income students are failing by percentage. The achievement gap has very likely widened and it will take an all out effort to restore educational equity.

That post is coming next week!

Please take care and stay safe. – ds

Moving Educational Issues to the Frontseat in the Midst of Pandemics and Insurrection

     January has given us a baker’s dozen days and so far, it’s giving 2020 a run for its money.         

Twice, I’ve written blog posts only to be overrun by the events of the day. An insurrection, a Covid surge, talk of impeachment, vaccination prospects, wonders about the inauguration on January 20th and security – it leaves me scrambling for stasis, any kind of normalcy. This was the 2020 playbook where educational priorities got in the back seat and stayed there, ignored simply because the world was on fire. In this new page of 2021, the fire is still spreading, but we do need to find ways to bracket the world around us. Students across the world are struggling with myriad issues; many can’t put their thoughts and fears into words but instead internalize it all. This blog continues to focus on how students return to the physical classroom and how we can support them as we reach for that goal and beyond.

     First, COVID: In the first thirteen days of January, there have been more than 8 million new cases worldwide with more than 155,000 deaths. Next week, the world will move past 2 million Covid related deaths with more than 100 million cases recorded worldwide. Yesterday saw record death counts in the UK (1564), Mexico (1314), and South Africa (806) for example. In the US, 41 of the 50 states reported more than 1000 new cases yesterday; in these first thirteen days, the US has more than 3 million new cases with almost 40,000 deaths. Staggering numbers. 

     Today, we heard from researchers in Ohio that two new variants of the coronavirus originating in the US have been discovered. In the coming days, we will hear more about virus mutations, debate the efficacy of developed vaccines on these mutations (One Shot J&J Vaccine Shows Promise), and wonder if we’ll ever get to that “normal” place again. 

     Trying to figure out future events like the Tokyo Olympics remind us we are still on stop. Europe experienced another surge in January and Japan has declared a state of emergency. Here in the US, school districts and university systems are trapped in a Catch-22 – there is no easy way to safely restart in-person learning for all until the vaccine program has reached deep into the population (in particular, teachers). In Sonoma County where I work, first dose vaccinations for some teachers are being proposed for mid February, meaning the possibility that some teachers would be available for in-person teaching by mid to late March. However, there are many other issues that play into a full reopening, and that may still be a matter of months. The prospect of the entire school year of 2020-21 being fully remote in some areas of the country, or at best hybrid, is very real.

     Second, the insurrection: As we see further video of the mob assaulting the Capitol, it’s clear that the attack was an attempt to halt Congressional business and keep President Trump in office. Over the next few days, America may face a continuance of this revolt. (Because America has rarely experienced inner revolt as it did in 1861, it is easy to be complacent and assume that the “government” will remain as it has; because I grew up in a different country – Jamaica – where the democracy was more fledgling, I know that a well-armed militia of citizens can disrupt and overthrow existing government. Governance is all an act of faith and more fragile than ever. The photos here show members of the National Guard sleeping in the rotunda and assembling outside the Capitol. Sobering.

Politically, the election results in Georgia and the aftermath remind us that the country’s polarization is entrenched. Whatever we think about Trump is not nearly as important as how we address the concerns of all people, including those Trump supporters who feel suddenly disenfranchised. Everyone may be feeling disenfranchised at the moment. I have taken to calling myself a radical moderate only because moderation has become a radical idea. How educators can effectively communicate with all members of a school community regardless of their divergent political views is part of this blog’s purpose.

During the next few months, we will also center on current local (Sonoma County, California) practice as well as regional, national and international approaches to student learning during and coming out of the pandemic. I’ll present some current student performance data broken down by subgroups as well as personal student stories that demonstrate how difficult true learning can be during this time. The focus question is: can we do better in reaching each student regardless of his/her race, economic status, and motivation?

January 5th was the first day of the second semester where I teach. My classes are semester length so I met a whole new set of students. In their introductory writing to me, each revealed some sort of reaction to Covid and how it has changed life. For some, it has meant isolation and loss of friends. Others have struggled in school, easily losing focus in an online world. One has experienced direct loss of a family member to Covid. And all have some degree of apprehension about the near future. Will we ever actually be on campus for our freshman year? Sports? Clubs? It’s heartbreaking, but we still have to get to work.

NEXT TIME: A Closer Look at the word “Equity”: What It Was Supposed to Mean and What Has Changed

Data Sources: John Hopkins and Worldometer

Post-Election Questions and Covid = Inertia (What do our students have to say?)

     It’s been a month since the election and we’re still sort of swimming in inertia. Whether it’s uncertainty of the election or uncertainty over where Covid numbers are going, most of us wonder what tomorrow will bring. That makes action difficult, but in education, our students are signalling that action is necessary, and soon.

     On Election Night 2020, I never actually got to sleep. I’m a politics junky in normal times, wondering who won the city council race, whether that state proposition will pass, or who won a close Senate race. But this one was different. As the evening wore on, it really started to get hard to watch the results. I flipped back and forth between CNN and Fox, listening to either side prognosticating. Early in the evening, it looked like Florida was going Biden Blue. Some returns showed him leading in Tampa/St Petersburg. I think it was around this time that I texted a couple of friends about the “landslide” to come. And then there were some other early Biden numbers that were promising in Wisconsin. It looked good.

     By 9pm Pacific time, things had swung hard in the other direction. Trump was winning fairly comfortably in Michigan and Pennsylvania. And the Senate races were looking shaky too. Susan Collins was holding a lead in Maine, the incumbent Democrat from Michigan was losing, and though Georgia was tight in the presidential race, Ossoff was down much more than expected. It made me feel like four years ago when my wife and I went to the Petaluma Women’s Club to watch election night. Then, as it gradually became clear that Trump was actually going to win, we felt this odd tightness, like all the air was out of the room but also our lungs, like we couldn’t quite breathe.

     I/we have waited four years to get our breath back and now in 2020, despite all the classless comments, the blatant disregard for many citizens, all the talk of the Wall, and a pandemic that had killed almost a quarter of a million, this man was going to win again. That was my midnight despair.

     So I stayed up, watching the commentators, listening for hope. The Fox folks were crowing a bit and the CNN crew was forlorn. And I was imagining four more years of a ravaging national shortness of breath, where we would move to, what a bleak future looked like.

     I must have dozed off at some point, so I can’t put my finger on when the tide began to turn. By daylight, it was becoming clear that depending on whether the absentee vote had been counted made all the difference. The walk up Election Day vote leaned Trump but the absentee was heavy Biden. 75%, 80%, 85%. Biden was catching up in the Midwest, and he had a decent chance to hold on in Arizona and Nevada. Bonus points for Georgia. 

     Of course, you know all this. But here we are almost a month later and me, we, the country, the world, are stewing in limbo. We can’t move forward…on anything. In the last couple of months, I have written posts based on my research and observations about student equity, systemic racism in education, the reallocation of educational resources, all critical for public education going forward. But they’re all sitting in an unpublished folder, stuck in inertia borne out of the election and Covid.

     There is a time and place for a full discussion of critical education issues, but I just can’t go there yet. The day-to-day experience of trying to get kids to learn in an online environment is center stage. My students are managing to hang in there, most still attending class and moving forward. This morning, I asked them to write in their online journal a response to this scenario: If we end up remaining in an online learning environment into January and beyond, do you think you will learn as much as you would have at the physical school? What advice would you give to teachers and school leaders about making virtual school better? 

Here is what they wrote, unedited:

I don’t think it’s possible for me to learn to my potential in either settings personally because of my learning disabilities, but I feel like shifting the way it’s always been would definitely not make any progress for me to help me learn, so I definitely feel like this environment is much more difficult for me. I don’t have any advice for teachers to help me learn better here besides just pacing out work and not thinking we have all the time in the world to do a million assignments. You cannot treat this the same as normal school because it is different, the work has to be different.

I hate online with all my heart’s content. I’m scared I’m going to fail. In regular school I was doing so good and had good grades. I used to love school. But for online school I despise It with every fiber In my body. Online school ruined everything I had going for myself and at this rate I’m going to “HAVE” to repeat. I hate It. It’s so easy to get distracted. It’s so BORING and I just don’t like It. Hate It. I’m done for. I wish I could go back to normal school. I promise you I would do so much better In “ACTUAL” School. Now Im Screwed. It really does suck. I wanted to exceed but when online school started I fell down like a baby struggling to walk. Now I’m down at the bottom. Definitely does not work for me.

If we stayed in online school I wouldn’t learn as much as I would in real life. Online school is not really working for me but I’m really trying. I think that it’s not the teachers fault that online school sucks, it’s just california. But I would really like to do hybrid learning and actually make friends.

I 100% think that since covid, students have not learned as much if not lost a lot of knowledge, i think this because teachers are just throwing work at their students without explaining it as much or telling us they are just throwing it at us. So only advice to future students is some days don’t have any work just have fun or talk all class or just let them out earlier then usually. I do think this is better for me as an athlete because school is usually 7 hours but now its only 3 ish and i already have 2+ practices a day sometimes 3 and that’s everyday so with 7 hours of school i wouldn’t be able to do it all.

If we ever go back to regular school I will definitely learn more than in online school. Probably because I learn better in person and with physical touch, i’ll also be with people in person so i can communicate with people better. But in online school it’s really hard to keep up with and hard to communicate. I feel like next year I’ll be like yeah you were in my english class and they won’t remember because it’s really hard when people dont show her face on zoom and don’t hear their voices. I think the teachers are doing just fine. I can tell they’re trying really hard to have this online environment feel like school. 

I think that i am learning mostly the same as i would in normal school. Obviously there are many things that we can’t do bc of distance learning like hands on learning and fun things like rallys or dances. Advice I would give to teachers is to try to incorporate fun projects 

There are some things I like and don’t like about online learning but I don’t think I would want it to continue on to January because I feel like it’s just harder to learn in online school. Especially since i have to take care of my sisters at the same time so i have to multitask and don’t get some things done. Some Things teachers can do is put a video on the assignment on how to do the assignment and explain it for some kids that might be confused.

I personally think that we will get learning done but not as much because we can’t get into physical contact and we won’t have the same experience as other people have. To make virtual school better would probably be by making it more engaging and probably not assigning us so much homework that’s due on the same day so it won’t be stressful to us. I think online learning has worked for me because it isn’t really a hassle getting up and getting dressed early in the morning as it was with physical learning but other than that i think online learning has been going well.

If we end up staying home for the rest of the school year I feel we will not have learned everything we had to this year because classes are shorter than they would be in person so we are not able to learn everything we need to. To make virtual school better I think we have to go for longer times so our teachers can teach us everything they need to teach to us. Online school has worked for me because I want to succeed in school for a good life and education but people that feel differently then me probably has not worked for them so I think finding a way to go back to school would be the best option.

Honestly, I have a love hate relationship with distance learning, one because I like that I’m alone, I just rather be on my own than be social with others. On the other hand, I feel that it’s really impacted my mental health and ability to talk with others. If however we do go back to distance learning, I wouldn’t mind too much just because it’s easier to interact with my teachers better rather than an email. For the most part I would say, I really have nothing to do at home and going back to school could make me a little more motivated knowing that I have something to do during the day when the virus is over obviously. So all in all, I dont think im ready to go back just because of how high covid rates are, it seems too much of a risk and i think could have been handled a lot better. 

If we were to continue learning from home for the rest of the year, I would be fine with it. I’ve already gotten pretty used to how distance learning for me personally works. One thing I’ve noticed is that I get sort of tired in the middle of the day, like in 2nd and 5th period, thankfully it’s gotten better. As for learning-quality, some classes are harder to learn things in than others. I have no trouble learning about budgeting and financial literacy in this class(in fact I think my dad likes to help me with these particular assignments). It is harder sometimes to learn new math concepts though; for example, we are being taught on how to solve equations using the elimination method and I just don’t really get it, so it can be hard to get quick help. Usually I just text a friend which is also difficult because we can’t show each other what to do. 

If we don’t go back to school, all of us are going to be behind, there is no way we can learn the same amount of stuff in 3 hours, compared to 6, it’s just not enough time. Even if the teachers managed to cram it all in there kids would probably go crazy, I know I would. Advice I would give about virtual school to teachers is to try and understand us, this pandemic is a crazy time especially when we are wanting to hang out with friends and we can’t do it as often. Online has worked for me although I am very tired of it. My grades are better than they were in 8th grade and I think my teachers are doing an amazing job at helping us understand. 

If we end up doing online learning in January and beyond, I don’t think I will learn as much because I am more of an interactive learner and online learning doesn’t really give me a chance to interact with other students and my teachers. Even though we have breakout rooms, they tend to be really awkward and boring. We also can’t really work one on one with our teachers. One piece of advice I would give to the school leaders on how to make online learning better is to maybe find more ways for students to connect and make bonds online whether it’s playing games with their class or making breakouts room less boring. It will give the students a chance to interact even through an online environment. Also, maybe lessening the workload would help, because sometimes students don’t have the resources to get their work done because parents are working, they have siblings to take care of, or maybe they have a hard time reaching out to their teachers because we all know that teachers have a big workload as well. Preparing for classes and grading worksheets is a lot of work.

I think I will learn more at normal school because the classes are longer. Teachers can make online school better by only using one website, such as google classroom, to turn in work instead of using a 3rd party website. Online schooling has worked for me because I can do a lot more fun activities than in physical school. 

I am not sure. It kind of depends on the teacher and the student. If the student is putting in the effort to learn then yes we can learn as much as if we were in actual school. The teacher also has to put in effort (most teachers are doing that). We might not learn everything we need to learn completely but we would be pretty close. So far all the teachers I have are doing good. They would ask us questions like do we need help or stay after class if you have questions or need help. They are willing to help if we need help on something. Online school has its ups and downs. It has worked for me so far just that sometimes I can’t go into zoom or the zoom is lagging. I am still learning even if I am having trouble with zoom.

 If we do not end up going into school for the rest of the year, I do not think it will be as good because there are a lot more distractions at home and we also will not have wifi problems or other problems that have to do with technology if we are just in class. It would be easier.

For virtual learning, I’d be easier to cut some slack off the work. My assignments are piling and with my uncontrollable lack of focus it’s difficult to keep up while learning what is going on and I have friends who are struggling nearly as severe as I am and it’s impacting us really badly. 

I love distance learning because I don’t have to wake up as early and the classes are shorter. But I dont think distance learning helps me obtain information as much as going to school in real life. 

 I don’t think I would learn nearly as much as I did in real school. We would have more time and of course a better visual of the class and whatever material we would have. I have no advice to teachers on how to make online learning better. Honestly i don’t think it can get better, and online learning isn’t so bad. Yeah it’s annoying, but manageable. I think if we go back to class, especially during big tests that it will help students. There’s just something different about learning through a screen.

I think that if we do stay online with school then going back to in contact school I would be learning less than what I would be learning when I was in school.

I am definitely doing much worse than before, I definitely think i will not learn as much. I am a very hands on  learner and tend to forget things easily so that makes online school very frustrating for me. I don’t know, but I think that some teachers(not you) should be more lenient about late work. This is totally new for some people and I know I personally have trouble remembering to turn in work sometimes when I’m not physically handing it in. I would say online school hasn’t worked well for me.

If we remain in Virtual school next semester, I feel like that I won’t learn as much as I would in school.The reason I say that is because some assignments require talking about it, and also in science, specifically chemistry wouldn’t be fun and maybe that would in turn make the Juniors unhappy and in a bad mood during class. Also a lot of teacher’s don’t realize that some people’s wifi isnt where they could be in a quiet space so they have to be around the house with all of the commotion in the background. And during Covid, a lot of parents are working from home which makes more noise. Some teachers are down grading students for something that isn’t completely their fault. I have seen parents start to walk into the camera, and then as soon as the child notices, he turns off his video so everyone else doesn’t but into his life about having a cramped house where behind you is a busy travel between places in your house. Also, more teachers need to see kids’ chins, which doesn’t make sense because you can’t do anything with your chin. All the kids are trying to hide as much of their life as possible so not everyone knows how they live and how their lifestyle is.

 I think that I would not learn as much online then in physical school. Online school hasn’t worked for me much I prefer physical school because I also get to be around people including my friends and my house isn’t a good spot to do online school. 

If we continue to do school online I don’t think it will be a good thing. I think some students  can learn the same amount of school work online but the majority of students will fall behind.  I think learning online is very distracting and it is hard to get students full attention as there is always some kind of distraction at home. There are some kids who might be embarrassed to ask a question online with all their peers looking and listening to them so they can fall behind if not understanding the subject.   There are many ways of teaching and unfortunately we can’t learn everything online. Some students learn more from being in class and seeing visuals and having hands-on experience with students and teachers.  I don’t know what else teachers can do to help us learn online as they are doing their best but I do think once we go back into school you might see a lot of students who are behind and we might need to review the school work prior to moving forward.  Actually there is one thing that can help us students.  When test, homework and class work is returned it would be nice to actually see what you got wrong so we can learn from our mistakes.  It is hard to understand what we did wrong when the teachers just return our papers with a grade and no markups.  Online has some what worked for me but I do get a lot of help from my mom.  I go to classes, listen to my teachers but there are times when I am confused about the work and don’t get a chance to ask questions and that is where my mom steps up big time and really helps me and pushes me to be a better student.

I think that for me personally, I would probably be learning the same amount online vs in person school because I prefer working and learning independently and feel that my best work is done independently. Unfortunately there are some instances in which I feel as though distance learning is more difficult in the sense of communicating and directions for work and assignments because we don’t have teachers or other students around us to help explain or ask questions. Some advice I would give is to make sure that directions for work are very clear, so that no confusion around what we are doing occurs. Being an independent worker, I do think distance learning has worked for me because I am able to keep track and be accountable for my work and assignments. A downside is that I do tend to procrastinate and though I always get my work done, being more easily able to be sidetracked and procrastinate ultimately makes me stressed out when I have to do my work at the last minute. 

 I believe that we did not learn as much as we should have because of the circumstances. If we go back to school this year it is going to be weird because it is the first time that teachers are going to see more than just our heads.

In my opinion I feel like we don’t want as much in school because we don’t go to school as much as we do in real life and I feel like I learn more in person. I honestly don’t feel like you can make online school much better, I feel like we just have to deal with it which sucks because I’m not having the funnest I’m doing it. To keep it short and sweet I feel like online school has not worked for me in the slightest bit possible because I’ve been having to juggle Sports around especially lately because I have been starting to do more training. I feel like me and not seeing my friends on The Daily when we go to school makes my friendships harder to maintain because I’m not seeing them as much. And I feel like we are all losing out on that interaction in general with people, because I’m assuming most of us are staying home most of the time like me.

If online learning was to go into January and beyond, I personally don’t think I would learn as much, compared to, if I was at normal school. I think this because it has been harder to learn and communicate through Zoom and whatnot. However I think for me at least online learning has been ok, but I still think in person school is better, but if there is no in person school for the foreseeable future then that may be a problem for me and other kids. It may be a thing with me needing to concentrate on class more, but online school makes that trickier and it’s always better to do it in person in my opinion since it’s harder to get distracted. To be honest I’m not quite sure what teachers could do to improve online learning because the only thing I think could help me would be to go back to normal school, however obviously that’s not possible right now. Other students may have good ideas for online learning improvements and hopefully it will get better.

If we were to keep going with this online learning environment I don’t think we would learn as much as we would if we were in school. Advice I’d give to teachers is slow it down and keep in mind that people have a higher chance of depression, anxiety, and loneliness. Personally though I like online learning better because it’s easier and quicker. The one thing I don’t like and probably many others are breakout rooms where other students who you aren’t that comfortable with are in there and nothing happened. 

I don’t think I have learned nearly as much as I would have in school. Group work and talking to teachers about assignments is very difficult. Most group work assignments the group members have the option to mute and turn their cameras off and don’t do anything, where in person they don’t have the option to act like they aren’t there. My grades are lower than ever and I have more missing assignments because it is hard to talk to teachers about fixing work so they mark it missing. It is definitely harder and I feel bad after staring at a screen for three hours everyday (which doesn’t include the few hours for homework). Online school definitely hasn’t worked for me because I feel like it is more stressful and negative than it is beneficial. With one hour for each class, I feel like we always run out of time and we don’t have enough time to work on projects and do more classwork in class. With more time on a screen it would be more stressful.

If we did online school for the remaining of the year honestly i do think we will learn as much as if we would be physically at school. I feel like the teachers are doing a really good job with teaching us online and well for me I even found liking online more. Online school has worked for me a lot because it gets me to participate more in school knowing that not everyone is staring at me. Also since we end class at 12:15 it really gives me that whole day to do other things that aren’t school related. As if we were physically at school we would have less time to do our hobbies and more time spending our rest of the day worrying about if we would have enough time to finish our homework.

In virtual school I think I would have learned as much as I have if I were in a physical school. For teachers to make virtual school better just keep teaching and you’re doing just fine. Online learning has worked for me since I get to not only stay home but I get to basically choose where I sit to do school.

* * *

     One remarkable note from the student comments is the similarity of perspective. They almost universally dislike a “full” online experience. (It’s important to note that online experiences can be tailored for the individual with much more success than the whole class.) Much of the initial anecdotal and research on online suggests that some students are far less likely to succeed than others. 

     In my district, the performance gap we have tried so hard to close is widening in an online instruction model. After the first grading period of the year, the number of students with an “F” increased from 15% to 22% when comparing Fall of 2019 with this year. But for socio-economically disadvantaged (SED) students, the percentage went from 25% to 34%. One in three students in poverty are failing something. We’ve got to do something fast.

     So, where are we now? The significant challenges to public education have been underlined by Covid and the almost impossible task of keeping everyone – parents, students, teachers, staff, board members, community – happy about online learning, hybrid approaches, or return to school. Most notable but now almost lost in the day-to-day challenge of teaching students, is the need to address the system itself, particularly the question of whose voice is heard and whose voice has power in decision making.
     That’s the work of 2021. Starting in January, this space will focus on how to specifically address the issues of systemic racism, student poverty/equity, the reallocation of resources, and the need to change the leadership paradigm that plagues education. Watch this space and let’s fix this!

The Days After (Labor Day): Teaching in a Zoom World and What’s Next

National and California Context:

It’s the day after Labor Day, the traditional school opening day for much of the East Coast. In the mid-Atlantic region, some schools opened up after August 26th and the rest will see their students either all in-person or in a hybrid model starting Tuesday, September 8th. Across the country, the test that in person school is safe will come further into focus; if schools can pull off a safe re-entry, pressure will gradually mount on school systems that have instituted Distance Learning as the primary model.

School districts in Georgia, Tennessee, and much of the South have struggled to various extents with students and staff testing positive. The dilemma is firmly entrenched in politics, the shuttering of the economy versus keeping kids and staff safe versus desire for normalcy versus the need/desire to teach high-risk (special ed, low-income, ELD) students in person to avoid enormous achievement gaps. As of early September, no one really knows what is best. 

Notre Dame, Michigan State, University of North Carolina and others are joining many universities across the country going to online learning for some period of time, as Covid 19 cases hit their campuses. Since no one can predict an end date to the virus, the time frames are varied, from two weeks to eight weeks to the first semester. Many universities started classes a week or so early with the intention of finishing the first semester at Thanksgiving Break. As of early September, no one really knows what to do.

In California where I work, most school districts are Distance Learning (DL) exclusively. In Petaluma, DL is set to continue through Halloween; a couple of weeks prior to Halloween, the school board intends to weigh the situation to determine whether to return to some in-person classes by November 1st or remain in DL for the duration of the semester. 

At Santa Rosa Junior College, a primary post-secondary option for Sonoma County students, President Frank Chong announced last week that they would continue with an almost exclusive DL model for the entire 2020-2021 school year. In a statement, Chong said that it was “clear to me that the current infection and mortality rates in Sonoma County are far too high to consider a full return to face-to-face instruction. Other colleges and universities across the U.S. reopened for in-person classes too early and saw a dramatic increase in COVID infections.”

Teaching in Zoom

As a teacher who has now been Zooming with students for the past four weeks, I wonder how October, November, and December will look. In a crazy environment of trying to plan for every technological contingency, we have also been beset with record-shattering heat and fires all around us. California is burning in the midst of our Zoom experiment.

In my pre-Covid career, before every class I’ve ever taught, in those moments just before the students enter the classroom, I have always had this strange feeling of unrest. I suppose you could call it fear but that might be too strong a word. It’s the unsettled feeling of hopeful preparation for a lesson and class. Am I ready? Materials? Technology? Classroom? Instructional strategies primed? Group task assigned? Ultimately, I wonder if the students will be engaged. Will I need to pivot to something else if the lesson/discussion goes south? Am I ready for that? 

It is the frame for most teachers, that unsettled wonder about the next 50 or 70 or 100 minutes of class. I had a great friend and colleague who was a masterful teacher. He left teaching about 15 years ago because he grew tired of feeling unsettled. For him, it was physical. “I would get stomach aches, semi-nauseous before class. Once the kids came, it was fine. It was just the constant worry about being on my toes,” he said. I remember at the time being shocked. His temperament has always been easy going, relaxed, calm. But underneath, he was burning up and eventually burning out. 

But again, all this is pre-Covid. This fall, we are practising multiplication. Those feelings of unrest and uncertainty before a class are now amplified times two (three?), much closer to fear, anger, and resentment at what, by necessity, teaching has become. One teacher colleague said she is basically “surviving.” I have heard from many teachers and school staff saying they now plan to exit education earlier than originally planned. In the grocery store, I saw an instructional aide who I’ve worked with. “I love the kids but this (online teaching) just doesn’t work for me. I can’t help the kids the way I know how to.” At 68 years of age, she had intended to go until 70 but will leave at the end of the year. 

Some of the added unrest is figuring out how to pull off an effective online experience for students. Planning for an engaging Zoom lesson includes at least some of the following: 

  • Explicit and practised knowledge of the Zoom interface – settings, chat, mute, shared screen (and its pitfalls), breakout rooms and their settings, viewing the students, and many more.
  • Explicit and practised knowledge of extensions and applications that make the lesson engaging. Examples include Flipgrid, a video sharing tool for teachers and students (like TikTok for education); Edpuzzle, where teachers can add assessment to video and post to students; Clever, SeeSaw, Explain Everything, screencasting tools of various types…and trust me, this is a relatively tiny list of a universe of apps and add-ons.
  • Understanding what the end-user (student) can see, access, and accomplish. Knowledge of the applications above must include how students log in and navigate, from kindergarteners to 7th graders to seniors.
  • Quick prayers that your own technology will function, from internet connectivity, audio feed, Zoom interface, and transitions to video, live links, and remote guest speakers. I have already had a moment where my cursor simply disappeared and I could no longer navigate from the shared screen backwards. 
  • Ample time for students to interact in whole class discussion. In Zoom, whole class conversation can include “highlight” or focal groups where four students are unmuted and then asked questions about content. The group feels less direct pressure to respond but enough so that someone typically steps into the breach and responds.
  • Clear and frequent explanations about etiquette, and respect and trust for one another.
  • Humor, patience, and acceptance of The Things That Go Wrong
  • Ample time for small group discussion so that students who feel more comfortable in smaller settings can voice opinions and share content. This includes setting up breakout rooms beforehand and including accessible and relevant documents for the breakout rooms. (Sending kids off with instructions from the main screen without links leaves them in what one colleague called a “breakout wilderness.”)

The Break out room is a true trust experiment. The structure is similar to small groups in a classroom. I give the groups some topic of conversation and guidelines for engagement, including some task/product to keep them accountable. In a Zoom world, the typical student struggles to engage with others, at least initially. As I visit breakout roms to check in, I often find silent students or students who have left the screen altogether. I’ve had many wonder exactly where they went! Occasionally, he or she ends up in a breakout room of one, a virtual solitary confinement. Others have reported getting booted from the room and sent back to the Waiting Room. And others don’t know where they’ve been sent. “I thought I was at another school. I don’t really know the other kids in this class so I just thought you sent me to a different place.”

Even my own appearance in a breakout room is jarring for students. I’m an uninvited guest, barging in on conversation. I’m that cherry guy at a party wandering into a group and loudly asking How Are You Guys? Every day, something new…

Where Are We Now? How to predict…

Tracking what’s next with Covid-19 has been almost impossible to predict. Like many, I thought the summer months would cool the spread. Wrong. On September 4th, the worldwide number of new cases topped 300,000 for the first time. Since mid-July, the number of people dying worldwide due to Covid has remained stubbornly above 5000 per day. By the end of this month, more than a million people will have died. And no one has a clear sense of how Covid will react in colder weather.

The US accounts for about one quarter of the worldwide totals. By month’s end, more than 200,000 will have died; more than 7 million infections will have occurred. In this context, school systems will need to tread carefully, weighing the demonstrated needs of students to return to in-person teaching with the safety of the school community and the broader community at large. From the teacher perspective, Covid-19 is no win.

NEXT TIME: A First Grade Teacher’s Perspective

The First Day of School: Moving From Accountability to Agency Through Trust

It’s 5 am on the first day of school. That gentle terror that has been building in teachers for weeks is here with me as I write. No teacher I’ve talked to knows what to expect of Distance Learning and no teacher can confidently say those normal first day words: I’m ready.

What will happen is actually predictable and that is why today and these first days back to school require us all to dig deep and find our way to extend that jewel of a word: Trust.

This week and in the weeks that follow, as school districts across California and the country begin instruction, those five letters may be the most important to focus on. As we move into Distance Learning (DL), there are some things that are likely. Some schools will struggle; some schools will do things better than others; some teachers will be better at DL than others; some teachers will harness tech tools and manage to engage students; some will not be as successful; some students will be able to manage their school time, attend virtual school, and learn; some students will struggle mightily, find it difficult to organize themselves, and develop ZoomFlu. What will be critical is how we together consider all this, and ultimately how much we trust each other. If we can find the path to trusting that teachers will do their best, students will try, school administrators care deeply about their students, and parents believe teachers and schools are doing their best, then we have a chance; if we start picking the system apart, we will find the gaps, teachers who aren’t fully in the game, admin who don’t get it, students who are apathetic and unengaged, and parents who pile on with negative comments.

Schools play an enormous role in the community; often, academics will talk about “school and society” as inextricably linked. We can think of school as having at least five major constituencies: the students, the teachers, the parents, district and school administration, and the social/economic community at large. Let’s look at each one:

Students: We have about 58 million students feeling their own gentle terror this morning. What fears are at their doorstep? Maybe I’m starting a new year with new teachers; maybe I’m at a new school, moving up from 6th grade to junior high or 8th grade to high school; maybe I don’t have the right technology for all this; maybe my internet (if I have it) will glitch; maybe I don’t want to be in a Zoom class meeting like in the spring; maybe I hate being put on the spot by a teacher, spotlight view. Maybe I’m hungry and won’t get breakfast today. 

What we all must do is trust our students. They are the most asea amongst us, even though teachers may think we have the toughest part to play in all this. Give your students the leverage to make mistakes just as teachers will make mistakes. Hold their virtual hands and empathize with our collective place. Listen closely to what the students say as a group. Most importantly, listen closely to what our students say as individuals, as he or she shares his or her own gentle terror about what this first day means and looks ahead to what Day 37 or Day 49 will mean. Because that’s when we all have our real test of DL.

Teachers: Almost 4 million teachers have returned or are getting ready to return. Most have sat through countless training sessions, learning new tools to connect, inspire, excite, and teach. Teachers have always known how critical it is to engage the student in learning. Building the class community is one of the pillars of engagement and today, it is part of my wonder. How will engagement look? What teachers must do is trust their students to put their best effort forth, trust that parents will be supportive, even those who fervently wish that today, that yellow bus was rolling, trust that school administrators and district staff are not incompetent and are trying their level best to meet the school’s needs, and trust that the greater community will manage to make it through somehow.

Parents: You have the toughest job of all. Your extension of trust is the most difficult because you know the individual student story like no other. It is your child, whether 5 years old on the first day of kindergarten or 12 years old starting junior high or 17 starting an unknown senior year. You are the one who has had to pick up your child’s spirits, tell him or her it will be OK, encourage best effort. And you are talking into the wind because really, today of all days, you just don’t know what will happen. How will I work while my children are Zooming? Can I trust that they will get their work done? What will six different teachers at high school look like on Zoom, all with different ways of teaching? How will I help my child manage all the “homework”? How will we keep everything organized? How can I keep my child motivated for 12 weeks or more of DL? What about making friends? What about sports? Clubs? My child’s IEP? 504? School lunch? Wait, I have more questions….

The task to trust the system is enormous. We inside will say we’ve got this because we are trained to say that. Part of our job in schools is to say it will all be OK and we have a good plan. Instilling confidence is what we do. Kindergarten teachers do this every year – I know there are tears now, but he will be fine. Trust me. 

Remember that things will go wrong. It is how parents react when things don’t go as planned that will either keep the train rolling or derail the learning process. Remember everyone is actively trying to do their best. Remember that your personal fears about Covid may be the same fear felt by a school staff member. Remember that trusting in others allows them to feel they can reach their best.

Districts/School Admin: Ah, the gentle terror of a teacher of Day 1. Does it match the rising bile a high school principal faces? Or the attempt by the elementary principal to make everyone feel OK, even when he or she is wondering how it will come together? Or a superintendent trying to support every school in the district, even the one she knows has had problems before Covid and how on Earth will they manage this? Your jobs are perhaps the most difficult. Whatever goes south (and it likely will at some point), you get to listen to the complaint. You may have prepared well, trained school staff, communicated to all parties, done your level best, but school is school and some things will fall apart. At those times, you have to trust in the whole, trust that the people in schools together can make it work. Different, probably a lesser version of school than we wish for, challenging, but ultimately worthy of trust.

The Community: You are all of us. You get it. You see the Big Picture because it is your business that is struggling. You can’t see next week much less the first day of school. You may have employees you care for deeply. You may be an itinerant worker who can’t stay home with her children. You may be a banker whose loan portfolio is in the red. You may be a police officer struggling with a job that offers little solace. You may be a low-income parent who can’t figure out how to feed your children. You may be a single black mother with no place to turn. You may be older, have a pre-existing condition, hold a particular fear about Covid. You may be many of these things in one. Your trust is the hardest because it is truly a trust in the unknown. Remember it is not a trust that everything will work perfectly (because it will not). It is a trust that everyone is working to make DL work, to establish a bridge across which students continue learning and making progress.

Last Thoughts:

Trust is the heaviest lift. We have been used to ensuring students are accountable for their learning, that school administrators ensure that teachers are accountable for their teaching and professional development time, that district and county offices of education ensure the system is accountable to all students we serve. Today, we can use this moment of gentle terror to transfer accountability into agency: trust that students are trying to learn; trust that teachers are doing their best; trust that principals are running as hard as they can to keep it all together. Put your urge to blame others down for a few weeks and trust that somehow, together, we can do this.

Happy First Day of School, wherever you are.

Suddenly it’s August: Three Things to Consider About School Reopening (whenever that is!)

Schools in California are starting the year in a Distance Learning model. As we get closer to the start of the school year, there may be some schools (private, charter, public in a relatively COVID free area) who may offer some kind of in-person instruction. The discussion below is for the possibility of resuming in-person instruction at school, perhaps in October or November or January…

Back in May when I was thinking about school in the fall, I thought Covid-19 would have waned; I thought we would be in a position to think about in-person learning and how to reintegrate students. But as we move into August, we have to set the context of where we are before getting to a discussion of what return to school might look like.

The Covid numbers across the world on July 31st don’t bode well for resumption of in-person learning anytime soon. The US had more than 70,000 new cases with 1459 deaths. This marked the third day in a row with more than 1400 deaths, the highest since May 19-21st. Florida (256) and California (191) recorded the highest death totals so far; Texas has recorded almost 1000 deaths in the last three days; Georgia (81) had the highest death total since April 20th and Tennessee (27) the second highest since the pandemic began. The charts below show alarming growth in daily new cases and new deaths across the US.

In South America, it is bleak: in three days, Colombia recorded more than 1000 dead as well as the three highest new daily case counts; Bolivia had more than 250 deaths in the last three days (a peak) and has more than 50,000 active cases total; Mexico has recorded more than 47,000 deaths and today its second highest new case total; and Argentina is experiencing a spike in cases and deaths:

In Europe, where the media has assumed things are calm, the case totals may tell a different story: Germany and France had more than 1000 new cases on July 31st and Spain more than 3,000; Belgium experienced its highest three day new case total since May 7-9. It is possible that Europe may experience its own upward shift in numbers. Japan and Hong Kong are also showing worrying signs of increasing cases: Japan reported almost 1500 new cases on August 1st, the highest case count there since the pandemic began.

When looking at the 7 day average across the word, this week marked the highest case count so far and the highest death count since May 1st. We are not at the end of something but as Dr Fauci said, right inside an event of unknown outcome.

So now what?

In a normal year, teachers would be preparing for new classes and new students. This year, they are preparing for a series of unknowns. Brand new students who the teachers will meet for the first time in a virtual environment. All over the world, teachers are grappling with how they will create that critical “class community,” the place where students learn together. How will we manage to create environments where students feel safe, where they can learn, and where equity for all can be preserved?

School Board Meetings – Feedback

Because school board meetings across the United States are now viewable on Zoom and other apps, I’ve had a chance to see and hear some of the issues coming up regarding return to school. Without getting into the weeds of which state is doing what, I have noticed four consistent comments:

  1. Distance learning model for the first semester. The comments describe the general benefits – consistency of instruction (which most assume will be better than the March-April-May distance learning) where teachers know what they are getting into and can plan accordingly, and students/parents can develop a consistent learning routine. This is also the safest, most Covid sensitive approach. 
  2. Teachers, particularly those who teach Special Education and English Language Development, who are terrified of an entire semester of DL on the back of March, April, May. They worry that 10 months without in-person instruction will cause significant learning and equity gaps. 
  3. Parents who advocate for a return to in-person teaching “as soon as possible.” To their credit, they are generally focused on their children rather than the economic argument about schools-as-daycare. 
  4. The resource gap. These comments highlight the real problem underlying return to school. To do it at all will require significant new resources, classrooms, technology, safety measures, etc. This camp says no reopening until we get the things necessary to do it right.

You might note there are no wrong answers here. All four comment groups are aligned in logic. The school board meetings have highlighted the obvious: teachers are experts on teaching in ways that many lay school board members, district staff, and parents are not. Teachers can turn a microscope on what might happen during in-person instruction. As a group, teachers have significant wisdom on how to keep students, parents, and staff safe. 

All this being said, what are we going to do now? Are there any approaches that think about school, students, staff and parents once we can return to school.

Three Things to Consider:

  1. Zooming in Teacher Professional Development and Student Zooming

During the last two days, I participated in a county-wide professional development sequence called Disrupt 2020. We met in Zoom sessions from 8:30-3pm each day. The content was interesting, the speakers cogent and earnest, and there was fabulous conversation amongst teachers. Yet it was a very heavy lift to make it through the day. I was tired at the end and thankful it was over, even though the content was strong. Imagining this experience for students makes me more worried than ever. How engaged will students be on Day 3 of Distance Learning? Day 7? Day 38? What if the new tools teachers use become boring? What if online rules vary significantly from teacher to teacher, school to school? What if I wrote a thousand more questions?

  1. A “hybrid” approach for staff 

So, fingers crossed seventeen times, we hope that one day (in October? November? January?), we in California will be in-person again. What is most likely is that any shift to in-person learning will be gradual. It’s important to realize that schools can do a “hybrid” approach where some of the students and some of the staff are at school. We want as many kids at school as possible but we also want to protect teachers, particularly those at high-risk. How can we resolve these opposing forces? Perhaps we can use the physical space of school as the place for more students to congregate, albeit with social distancing, masks, etc., while those staff members who are at high-risk conduct instruction remotely.  Most of our schools feature large screen TVs, perfect for beaming in teacher instruction. Some students go to school, some staff stay home. 

This is obviously dependent on having enough willing staff to monitor students at school sites. If all staff elect to stay home, this won’t work.  Another unknown. But if this were possible, students could:

  • Be in their normal learning environments, have access to school tools, computers, software, books, desks, etc.
  • Have access to food lunch programs.
  • Have access to peer relationships, though in a socially distanced format.

It would also allow some ELD and low-income students to more readily access curriculum. In my experience with teaching in the distance learning format this spring, many of my ELD students attended rarely or not at all.  English Language Learners are more likely to be challenged by distance learning. In addition, the New York Times reported soon after distance learning began in the spring that many low-income students had high absence rates, perhaps due to issues with computer access. Switching to distance learning by the Internet does allow many students to continue their education, but places others at a serious disadvantage. After years of trying to close the achievement gap, distance learning may prove to reverse that progress. (More about this equity gap coming in a future post)

Of course, there is no easy way to keep students – particularly elementary students – from more direct contact with one another. Schools would need to carefully examine how Germany, Vietnam, and New Zealand  have reopened schools. Like baseball and other sports, schools that reopen will be responsible for the health and safety of all staff and students. The challenges are immense.

  1. What Happens If We Can Reopen Safely

Finally, as schools do reopen, each one will be watched closely by other school systems everywhere else. For example, Jefferson School District opened yesterday (Friday, July 31st). The experience schools like Jefferson have will play a critical role in how schools across the country act. If Jefferson and other schools find they can open safely, tremendous pressure will build on schools to reopen at some point this fall. Planning for that possibility is obviously important.

Uncertainty can lead us into more muddles but it is important to recognize that teachers and staff CAN find a way to educate kids effectively. Distance Learning will likely not be as effective as in-person instruction but other advantages such as losing the restriction of the bell schedule may open up opportunities for learning and experience. Covid is a rough and tough competitor to learning but schools and school staff have their wily ways too. Let’s keep looking at ways to keep staff and students safe while also exploring the newly possible.

NEXT TIME: Equity in School and District Staffing

The Catch 22 of Reopening Schools

In early July, a union rep texted me wondering what I thought about returning to school in the fall. She felt that most teachers in our city were not interested in returning to classrooms in the fall but would prefer Distance Learning exclusively for the semester, up through December. She made some good points – that this was the safest way to avoid contagion, that once announced, this model would allow for consistency and structure through the fall, and that any hybrid model would include the risk of contagion and possible future shutdown. I thought and thought before replying and then thought some more. Inside her question was a political football. Somehow, the federal government – Trump – had already taken the position of full school reopening and I found myself almost automatically shifting to the opposite view.

At this point in the Summer of the Pandemic, I was unsure and uncertain, just as I am now. I had created a huge to-do list that was limping along:: I’d be writing everyday, probably at least a 1000 words, maybe more; the backyard, especially the dusty, uneven area we call the Back 40, well, that will get some attention! The garage won’t look the same, not after I’ve cleaned it out. What else? Well, I’d be reconnecting with friends by phone, writing letters probably. I’d also be running every couple of days, maybe everyday. I’d build up gradually, do a mile the first time out and grow from there. I’d volunteer! 

Then the summer actually started. I did OK at first. I ran that mile, even got up to almost three miles. I made some calls to friends. I wrote a letter. I volunteered a few times. But all the while I kept following the pandemic. I spent a lot of time on a site called Worldometers that tracked daily new infections, new deaths, and probabilities for the future. I could see what was happening in my home country of Jamaica, in England where I was born, across the US state by state and sometimes county by county. And I couldn’t shut the numbers out. We just don’t know what tomorrow will bring so how do we plan for it? Where are we now? How many infections? Deaths? Vaccines? How do we reopen schools in uncertainty?

So I thought about what my union rep had said. What do I think about return to school? Like almost everything in life, answering the question depends on whether I’m focused on the individual (me) or the group (the students, the school, the parents). 

For me: I’m a 55 year old educator in generally good health at the moment. But I have some risk too. In 2012, I had an autoimmune response called AutoImmune Hemolytic Anemia (AIHA). After a short morning workout, I started urinating blood. My body had begun tackling a perceived virus and was breaking down red blood cells, sending the waste into my urine. I went on healthy doses of prednisone to halt the response. After a month of treatment, the immune response stopped, but the doctors couldn’t say if it would return.

And I have only one kidney. Almost thirty years ago, when dialysis was getting to be too much of a burden for my dad, I donated a kidney. He perked up almost immediately after surgery and lived ten more fulfilling years. 

So would getting COVID be a problem for me? Maybe. No one knows how his or her body will react to a virus, this virus in particular. Stories across the world of young, healthy folks getting very sick, sometimes fatally, make us all wary. So in terms of me alone, I agreed with much of what my union rep had said. I was at risk, if not just for myself than for my family. My wife, Cynthia, and our two almost adult children, our 6 month old puppy, and the six chickens we are raising for eggs depend a little bit on me being around. 

But I couldn’t get to the point of agreeing that this proposal – all Distance Learning in the fall, until December – was the best option we had. If Covid-19 continues to spread at current rates, the case for in-person instruction gets more and more difficult to make, in K12 and the university system. But what are we going to do about the kids, particularly students in low-income families who won’t have access to tutors or possibly the over-the-shoulder parent who pushes them along.

There are two fundamental problems at the center of the discussions about return to school: 

Problem 1: Many parents can’t figure out how they’ll manage their work lives with their children schooling at home. Assuming social distancing and cleanliness practices are in place, many of them wonder if school could resume in the fall in some fashion. They point to schools in Europe (Politico: School reopenings in Europe – June 11, 2020; NBC News: Update on European School Reopenings – July 9, 2020) that have reopened with various models. Many of these same parents are also apprehensive about the rise in Covid, particularly in Florida, California, Texas, and Arizona.

Problem 2: Teachers like me are at significant risk in a return to the classroom. USA Today/Ipsos polled both parents and teachers May 18-21 and found that 59 percent of parents were likely to pursue at-home learning options, like online classes or home schooling. An update of the poll released July 25th found similar numbers. 55% of Americans oppose reopening schools in the fall, but the question is now political, not scientific. 78% of polled Democrats oppose school reopening while 79% of polled Republicans favor opening schools.

Almost one-fifth of teachers said they likely would not go back to work in the fall if schools reopen. 30% of America’s teachers are 50 or older, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. Only very foolish districts would force teachers back to classrooms where chances of Covid contagion and possible death are potentials. Teacher unions across the country have advocated for Distance Learning as the exclusive form of instruction, as has my home district. Large districts like LA, San Diego, San Francisco, and Sacramento will start the school year in distance learning with various future hybrid models proposed. Texas schools are struggling with how they will reopen. In Houston, the state’s largest district, students will spend the first 6 weeks in distance learning exclusively, a significant shift from the governor’s first order. In Florida, the teacher’s union is suing Governor DeSantis’s administration over return to the classroom. On July 23rd, Arizona dropped plans to restart schools on August 17th based on increasing virus cases. 

These examples of those in government who do not teach or run schools trying to legislate how we will return to school leaves school staff sidelined and confused. Christina Curfman’s story and her decision to retire at 55 echo the thoughts of many teachers across the country thinking about returning to teach in person in the fall. How do teachers interact with students in person in an effective manner and prevent the spread of COVID? Others have suggested that the chance of transmission is extremely low. A British epidemiologist claims that “no teacher” has caught Coronavirus from a student “anywhere in the world.” There is simply tremendous uncertainty.

A paper posted to the CDC website as part of updated guidance titled “The Importance of Reopening America’s Schools This Fall” (July 23. 2020) argues that school closures particularly affect students from low-income families who are “far less likely to have access to private instruction and care and far more likely to rely on key school-supported resources like food programs, special education services, counseling, and after-school programs to meet basic developmental needs.” The paper focuses on students and their relative risk of contracting COVID. A teacher might note that there is not much attention given in the guidance to teacher safety and health, though K-12 Schools administrators are provided a template and guidance for keeping the school site as safe as possible. And there are thousands of opinion pieces online about what to do, including this opinion by Erin Bromage of the University of Massachusetts that appreciate the nuances of return to school.

The only thing certain at this point (late July) is that we don’t know what next week will look like. 

CDC Guidance for Re-opening schools – May 19, 2020

CDC Guidance for Re-Opening Schools – July 23, 2020

American Prospect: We Need to Reopen Schools in America, But How? June  8, 2020

Politico: School reopenings in Europe – June 11, 2020

NBC News: Update on European School Reopenings – July 9, 2020

Forbes (Peter Greene): Want Schools Open in the Fall, then pay for it. – July 7, 2020 

NEXT TIME: Examining the Pros and Cons of an “upside-down” flipped classroom for COVID-era teaching.

Back to Blogging

Back in the early 2000s, I was a frequent blogger as a classroom teacher. Eventually, I got out of the habit and let blogging go. That blog no longer exists as far as I know…

In 2008, I became a school administrator, a role in which I served until 2019. I completed my doctorate that summer and have been conducting research as well as teaching since then.

The current topsy turvy world of K12 and university education has made me think more about how my experience can contribute to what happens next in a Covid world. This blog is focused initially on making sense of schooling at this point – to keep teachers and school staff safe, to consider models of teaching that don’t push low-income and non-white students to the rear, and to look for compromises rather than all-or-nothing solutions.

I hope you’ll follow and comment down the road.

Cheers,

David Stirrat